Case Study Tag: Roadway departure

Nebraska’s Interstate Cable Median Barrier Success

Nebraska
Nebraska implemented cable median barrier on a few segments of Interstate 80. We have observed a reduction in fatalities and serious injuries from cross-over median crashes. The poster will also include cable median barrier strike and repair stats to show the maintenance perspective with safety.

Advanced, Interlocking Portable Concrete Barrier

Nebraska
A new, advanced portable concrete barrier (PCB) was developed to satisfy MASH Test Level 3 safety criteria. The PCB eliminates joint hardware by utilizing interlocking top and bottom segments, which provides joint continuity, improved strength, and greatly reduces barrier deflections.

Advancing Data-Driven Safety Management in Virginia

Virginia
Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) relies on data-driven approaches to identify high-risk locations and guide investments in roadway safety. This combined research effort advances Virginia’s safety management practices through three complementary studies focused on freeway ramp interchanges, collector-distributor (CD) roads, and two-lane rural roads (TLRR). First, to support network screening, Safety Performance Functions (SPFs) were developed for entrance and exit ramps at public roadway (typically non-freeway, or non-limited access roads) interchanges, system to system interchange ramps, and collector-distributor roads at interchanges. Analyses revealed that SPFs developed using both Hoerl and power functions provided comparable goodness-of-fit. The resulting SPFs have been integrated into VDOT’s network screening process to identify potential for safety improvement (PSI) ramp segments. Second, VDOT calibrated the Highway Safety Manual (HSM) predictive method for ramps to support evaluating safety performance for geometric design projects on entrance ramps, exit ramps, CD roads, and connector ramps. This evaluation used data from 587 ramp segments to develop calibration factors, calibration functions, calibrate severity distribution functions (SDFs), and develop updated default crash type distributions. The results suggested that entrance and exit ramps should be calibrated separately from CD roads and connector ramps. Additionally, the results suggested that fatal and injury crashes can be calibrated separately from property damage only crashes. The study recommended calibration factors for entrance and exit ramps, and calibration functions for CD roads and connector ramps. Third, a systemic safety prioritization framework for TLRR combined a negative binomial SPF and fatal-and-injury crash density analysis to score 17,027 miles of TLRR. Segments were scored, normalized, and grouped into four risk tiers at both statewide and district levels. Then they were aggregated into corridors to support flexible segment-, curve-, or corridor-level reviews and site selections. The top 2.7 percent of segments captured nearly half of all severe roadway departure crashes, providing a repeatable, data-driven tool for statewide and district-level planning. Collectively, these studies expand Virginia’s capabilities to identify, prioritize, and address high-risk locations, advancing the Commonwealth’s commitment to the Safe System approach and enabling more strategic allocation of safety resources.

A Proactive Path to Safer Roads: New Jersey DOT’s Systemic Safety Program

New Jersey
NJDOT’s systemic safety approach proactively reduces crash risk by applying low-cost, proven countermeasures across the network. The poster summarizes horizontal curve, wrong-way driving, school zones, signalized intersection, pedestrian, and bicyclist analyses using a machine learning approach.

AASHTOWare: Prioritizing Roadway Departure Crashes

AASHTO
AASHTOWare compares and contrasts three methods for safety improvement location identification: 1) crash prediction model, 2) expected crash frequency exceeding threshold, and 3) crash prediction model + systemic safety characteristics.

FDOT’s Statewide Systemic Analysis

Florida
FDOT uses a data-driven, risk-based approach to guide systemic investments. Their systemic analysis led FDOT leadership to approve $35 million in HSIP funds, plus additional state funding for safety investments.

Oklahoma Safety Performance Measures

Oklahoma
Oklahoma DOT uses safety performance measures to identify and address safety issues like roadway departure, wrong-way driving, and work zone safety.

A Machine Learning Approach to Systemic Safety Project Location Identification

Ohio
ODOT used machine learning to identify locations for systemic safety projects, focusing on pedestrian and roadway departure crashes.

FoRRRwD in Massachusetts

Massachusetts
MassDOT’s FoRRRwD initiative provided municipalities with low-cost safety countermeasures. As countermeasures were implemented, MassDOT noted reduced crashes and serious injuries from crashes.

Enhancing Nighttime Visibility for Safety

FHWA
The nighttime fatality rate on the nation's roadways is three times higher than the daytime rate, and 76% of pedestrian fatalities occur at night. FHWA offers tools including safety countermeasures, updated and new approaches for lighting design and traffic control devices.